CVE-2026-22796 is classified as a type confusion vulnerability in OpenSSL, specifically affecting the signature verification process of signed PKCS#7 data. This vulnerability arises when an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without validating its type, resulting in the potential for an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing malformed PKCS#7 data. With a CVSS score of 5.3, this vulnerability is considered medium in severity.
The exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. Applications that perform signature verification of PKCS#7 data or directly invoke the PKCS7_digest_from_attributes() function are at risk. When the type of the message digest attribute is not validated, it may cause the application to access invalid memory, leading to a crash.
To successfully exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must supply a malformed signed PKCS#7 message to an application that performs verification. However, the impact of this vulnerability is limited to DoS, and it is worth noting that the PKCS7 API is considered legacy; applications are encouraged to utilize the CMS API instead.
It is important to highlight that the FIPS modules in versions 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the parsing implementation for PKCS#7 falls outside the FIPS module boundary. The affected versions include OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.1.1, and 1.0.2.
Vulnerability Details
The vulnerability, CVE-2026-22796, occurs due to a type confusion in the signature verification process of PKCS#7 data. It has a CVSS score of 5.3, indicating a medium severity. The affected components and vendor are OpenSSL, specifically all versions prior to the vendor patch.
Technical Analysis
The root cause of this vulnerability lies in the improper validation of ASN1_TYPE union members during the signature verification process. The attack vector is network-based, which means an attacker can exploit this vulnerability remotely. The complexity of the attack is low, as it does not require any special privileges or user interaction. The impact on availability is low, as it can cause a Denial of Service, while confidentiality and integrity impacts are non-existent.
Risk & Impact Analysis
Organizations utilizing affected versions of OpenSSL need to consider the risk associated with this vulnerability. The potential for a Denial of Service attack could disrupt services, leading to downtime and associated costs. Given the medium severity rating, organizations should address this vulnerability in their patch management cycle. The blast radius is limited to applications relying on PKCS#7 signature verification.
Exploitation Status
Signal | Status |
|---|---|
Known Exploit | No |
Public PoC | No |
Actively Exploited | No |
Ransomware Use | No |
Affected Versions
The following OpenSSL versions are affected by this vulnerability: 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.1.1, and 1.0.2. Organizations should ensure they are running patched versions to mitigate this risk.
Mitigation & Remediation
To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should apply the latest patches for OpenSSL. Regular updates are crucial for maintaining security. If a patch is unavailable, consider using configuration hardening and network controls to limit exposure. For more information, organizations can refer to the application security assessment services to identify potential risks.
Detection Guidance
Organizations should monitor logs for indicators of exploitation attempts related to PKCS#7 data verification. Look for unusual application crashes or service interruptions that coincide with PKCS#7 processing. Behavioral anomalies in applications using OpenSSL can also indicate exploitation.
AppSecure Threat Intelligence Insight
The long-term significance of CVE-2026-22796 reflects ongoing vulnerabilities in legacy systems like PKCS#7. Security teams should prioritize transitioning to more secure APIs, such as CMS, to prevent similar issues in the future. Monitoring for vulnerabilities in widely-used libraries like OpenSSL is essential for proactive defense. For more insights on security strategies, consider exploring our penetration testing methodology and vulnerability management program design resources.
Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

.webp)