Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Erik AntiSpam for Contact Form 7 cf7-antispam allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects AntiSpam for Contact Form 7: from n/a through <= 0.6.3. The CVSS score for this vulnerability is 5.4, classifying it as medium severity. Organizations should take this threat seriously, as it may lead to unauthorized actions being performed on behalf of users.
The vulnerability was published on July 16, 2025, and is currently in a deferred status. The risk to organizations includes potential data integrity issues, given that the CSRF vulnerability can allow attackers to manipulate user actions without their consent.
As of now, there is no public exploit confirmed for this vulnerability, and it is not listed in the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. However, organizations are urged to monitor for any updates regarding exploit availability and to assess their exposure.
Organizations should prioritize patching immediately to mitigate risks associated with this vulnerability, especially those using the affected versions of the AntiSpam for Contact Form 7 plugin.
Vulnerability Details
The vulnerability allows Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Erik AntiSpam for Contact Form 7. The affected versions range from n/a through <= 0.6.3. The CVSS score of 5.4 indicates medium severity, with impacts on integrity and availability classified as low. The vulnerability falls under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) ID CWE-352.
Technical Analysis
The root cause of this vulnerability lies in the lack of proper CSRF protection mechanisms in the plugin. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by tricking users into submitting unauthorized requests through a web interface. The attack vector is network-based, requiring low complexity, and does not require any privileges or user interaction. The potential impact includes low integrity and availability risks.
Risk & Impact Analysis
Risk to organizations includes unauthorized actions executed in the context of authenticated users, which could lead to data manipulation or loss. The blast radius potential is moderate, especially for organizations relying heavily on the affected plugin for managing contact forms. Organizations should assess their exposure to this vulnerability and consider the urgency of remediation based on their deployment context.
Exploitation Status
Signal | Status |
|---|---|
Known Exploit | No |
Public PoC | No |
Actively Exploited | No |
Ransomware Use | No |
Affected Versions
All versions prior to vendor patch, specifically AntiSpam for Contact Form 7 from n/a through <= 0.6.3, are affected by this vulnerability.
Mitigation & Remediation
Organizations should apply available patches or updates to the AntiSpam for Contact Form 7 plugin to remediate this vulnerability. If a patch is unavailable, consider implementing additional security controls such as web application firewalls to filter out potentially harmful requests. Regular reviews of CSRF protection mechanisms should also be conducted to ensure robust security.
Detection Guidance
Monitor logs for unusual request patterns that may indicate attempts to exploit the CSRF vulnerability. Look for behavioral anomalies that could suggest unauthorized actions have been executed in the context of authenticated users.
AppSecure Threat Intelligence Insight
The CSRF vulnerability in Erik AntiSpam for Contact Form 7 highlights the importance of implementing robust CSRF protections in web applications. As attackers continue to find new ways to exploit vulnerabilities, it is crucial for security teams to stay vigilant and regularly assess their defenses. For further reading on securing web applications against CSRF vulnerabilities, organizations can refer to the CSRF attack prevention strategies and consider engaging in penetration testing services to validate their security posture.
Ongoing education and training for developers on secure coding practices can also significantly reduce the occurrence of such vulnerabilities in the future.
Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

.webp)