This vulnerability allows a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack in the Dutch van Andel Custom List Table Example custom-list-table-example, enabling reflected XSS. The vulnerability affects versions from n/a through 1.4.1. With a CVSS score of 7.1, this vulnerability is classified as high severity, indicating a significant risk to organizations utilizing this plugin.
Risk to organizations includes potential unauthorized actions taken on behalf of users, leading to data exposure or manipulation. Exploitation requires user interaction, making it crucial for users to be aware of this vulnerability when accessing affected systems.
The urgency for defenders is high, as the potential for exploitation exists, and the plugin remains in use across various platforms. Organizations should prioritize patching immediately.
As of now, there are no public exploits or known active exploitations associated with this vulnerability; however, the risk remains due to the nature of CSRF vulnerabilities.
Vulnerability Details
The CSRF vulnerability in the Dutch van Andel Custom List Table Example allows reflected XSS, which can be leveraged by attackers to execute unauthorized scripts in the context of a user’s session. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-352, indicating that it allows for CSRF attacks.
The CVSS score of 7.1 reflects a high severity, suggesting that attackers can exploit this vulnerability with low complexity and without requiring privileges. The attack vector is network-based, necessitating user interaction, which is a common aspect of CSRF vulnerabilities.
This vulnerability was published on January 16, 2025, and is classified as deferred, indicating that it has not yet been assigned a full remediation priority by the vendor.
Technical Analysis
The root cause of this vulnerability lies in the insufficient validation of requests coming from users. Attackers may leverage this by crafting malicious requests that exploit the CSRF flaw, leading to reflected XSS attacks if the user is tricked into clicking a link.
The attack vector is through the network, and the complexity is low, requiring minimal effort for an attacker. Importantly, no privileges are required to exploit this vulnerability, and user interaction is necessary to initiate the attack.
The impact of a successful CSRF attack generally includes low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts, as the attacker would primarily aim to perform actions as the user without their consent.
Risk & Impact Analysis
Real-world deployment risk is significant for organizations using the affected versions of the Dutch van Andel Custom List Table Example plugin. The potential for exploitation can lead to unauthorized actions, data manipulation, or even account takeovers, depending on how the application processes requests.
This vulnerability matters to organizations as it highlights shortcomings in their security posture, especially regarding user input validation and session management. The blast radius for such vulnerabilities is considerable, affecting any user who may interact with the compromised functionality.
The urgency is underscored by the CVSS score and the fact that there are no known public exploits at this time. Organizations should assess their risk based on their exposure to this vulnerability and prioritize remediation in their patch cycles.
Exploitation Status
Signal | Status |
|---|---|
Known Exploit | No |
Public PoC | No |
Actively Exploited | No |
Ransomware Use | No |
Affected Versions
This vulnerability affects all versions of the Dutch van Andel Custom List Table Example plugin from n/a through 1.4.1. Organizations using these versions should take immediate action to mitigate the risk.
Mitigation & Remediation
Organizations should prioritize patching immediately. An updated version of the Dutch van Andel Custom List Table Example should be deployed to mitigate this vulnerability. If an update is not available, organizations should consider implementing workarounds such as disabling the affected functionality or applying web application firewalls to filter malicious requests.
Configuration hardening and regular monitoring for anomalous activity can further reduce exposure. Organizations may also benefit from engaging in penetration testing to identify similar weaknesses.
Detection Guidance
Organizations should monitor logs for unusual request patterns that may indicate CSRF attempts. Behavioral anomalies such as unexpected actions taken by users should also be flagged for further investigation. Network signatures related to CSRF attacks can help in early detection.
AppSecure Threat Intelligence Insight
The long-term significance of this vulnerability highlights the importance of robust input validation in web applications. As organizations increasingly rely on third-party plugins, the potential for vulnerabilities like these underscores the necessity for thorough security assessments.
This vulnerability represents a pattern of security oversights in plugin development and the need for ongoing vigilance. Security teams must prioritize proactive measures to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities in their applications.
For further reading on application security best practices, consider reviewing our application security assessment guide and the latest trends in vulnerability management.
Additionally, organizations should consider the insights from our vulnerability management program design to enhance their security posture.
Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.
.webp)