This vulnerability allows for Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks in the Manuelvicedo Forge – Front-End Page Builder. The security flaw can lead to Stored XSS, placing organizations at risk. With a CVSS score of 7.1, this high-severity vulnerability requires immediate attention. The potential impact includes unauthorized actions being performed on behalf of users, which could compromise sensitive data.
The vulnerability is deferred, indicating that while it has been identified, further evaluation or action may be pending. Organizations utilizing versions of Forge – Front-End Page Builder prior to 1.4.6 should be particularly vigilant, as they are directly affected by this issue. Risk to organizations includes the exposure of users to malicious content and unauthorized actions through CSRF attacks.
As of now, there is no information suggesting public exploits or known active exploitation of this vulnerability. However, organizations should not underestimate the potential for exploitation due to its high severity and the nature of CSRF vulnerabilities. Organizations should prioritize patching immediately.
Mitigation efforts should focus on upgrading to the latest version of the affected plugin and implementing additional security measures to protect against CSRF attacks.
Vulnerability Details
The Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Manuelvicedo Forge – Front-End Page Builder allows for Stored XSS. This issue affects versions from n/a to 1.4.6. The CVSS score of 7.1 indicates a high severity level with an attack vector over the network, low attack complexity, and no required privileges for exploitation.
The vulnerability was published on February 3, 2025, and is classified under CWE-352, which relates to Cross-Site Request Forgery. The low impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is notable; however, the ability to perform unauthorized actions poses a significant risk.
Technical Analysis
The root cause of this vulnerability is inadequate verification of requests, allowing attackers to forge requests on behalf of authenticated users. The attack vector is network-based, meaning that an attacker can exploit this vulnerability remotely. The attack complexity is low, and no privileges are required, making it accessible to a wide range of potential attackers.
User interaction is required, as the targeted user must be tricked into performing an action, but once successful, the implications can be severe. The impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability are all rated as low, but the vulnerability's ability to execute unauthorized actions should not be underestimated.
Risk & Impact Analysis
The deployment of this vulnerability in real-world scenarios exposes organizations to significant risks. Given the nature of CSRF vulnerabilities, attackers may exploit them to perform actions as authenticated users, potentially leading to data breaches or unauthorized modifications. The blast radius can be expansive, especially if multiple users are affected.
Urgency for organizations to act is high, as the potential for exploitation exists despite the lack of confirmed active exploitation. Organizations should schedule remediation as a priority to mitigate the risks associated with this vulnerability.
Exploitation Status
Signal | Status |
|---|---|
Known Exploit | No |
Public PoC | No |
Actively Exploited | No |
Ransomware Use | No |
Affected Versions
All versions prior to vendor patch (v1.4.6) are affected by this vulnerability. Organizations should ensure that their installations of Forge – Front-End Page Builder are updated to the latest version to mitigate potential risks.
Mitigation & Remediation
Organizations should prioritize patching the affected plugin by upgrading to version 1.4.7 or later. In cases where immediate patching is not feasible, consider implementing workarounds such as disabling features that may expose users to CSRF attacks. Configuration hardening, including proper validation of requests, can further strengthen defenses against this vulnerability.
Monitoring user activity for unusual behavior can also help identify potential exploitation attempts.
Detection Guidance
To detect potential exploitation of this vulnerability, organizations should monitor logs for unusual user requests and behavior. Look for indicators such as unexpected actions taken by authenticated users and requests that do not match typical patterns.
AppSecure Threat Intelligence Insight
The long-term significance of this vulnerability lies in the continuing prevalence of CSRF attacks in web applications. Organizations must be vigilant in their application security practices to prevent similar vulnerabilities from being introduced.
Security teams should continuously evaluate their defenses against emerging threats and trends, as this vulnerability exemplifies the need for proactive security measures in application development.
For more insights on application security best practices, organizations should consider reviewing resources on security testing best practices. Additionally, incorporating vulnerability management programs into security workflows can enhance overall security posture.
Finally, for organizations utilizing cloud environments, reviewing best practices in cloud security assessments can provide additional layers of protection against vulnerabilities like this one.
Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.
.webp)