Bome Restorator 1793 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by supplying an excessively long string in the Name field. Attackers can create a malicious payload exceeding 4000 bytes and paste it into the Name input field to trigger an application crash and denial of service. This vulnerability has a CVSS score of 6.9, indicating a medium severity level that requires attention from security teams.
Risk to organizations includes potential service interruptions, compromising the availability of the application. Since the vulnerability can be exploited locally without requiring user interaction or elevated privileges, the threat landscape is concerning. Organizations should prioritize patching immediately.
Currently, there is no known public exploit for this vulnerability, and it is not actively exploited in the wild. However, the possibility of local attacks should not be overlooked, and organizations must remain vigilant in their security practices.
Given the potential impact of a denial of service attack, organizations using Bome Restorator 1793 are advised to take immediate action to mitigate this vulnerability.
Vulnerability Details
The vulnerability is classified as CWE-120, which corresponds to buffer overflow vulnerabilities. It impacts the availability of the application, as the successful exploitation can lead to an application crash.
The CVSS score of 6.9 signifies a medium severity, indicating the need for organizations to address this vulnerability in their patch cycle.
Technical Analysis
The root cause of this vulnerability lies in the inadequate validation of user input in the Name field. As attackers can supply excessively long strings, this leads to a buffer overflow which ultimately crashes the application.
The attack vector for this vulnerability is local, meaning that an attacker must have physical or remote local access to the machine running the software. The attack complexity is classified as low, and no privileges or user interaction are required to exploit the vulnerability.
The impact on availability is high, as successful exploitation results in application crashes that disrupt service. No confidentiality or integrity impact is associated with this vulnerability.
Risk & Impact Analysis
The risk to organizations includes significant downtime and loss of service for users, which can lead to reputational damage. As this vulnerability allows local attackers to exploit the application without any permissions, the blast radius could affect multiple users depending on the deployment.
Organizations should assess their environments to identify any instances of Bome Restorator 1793 and prioritize remediation based on the potential impact of service disruption.
Given the CVSS score, organizations should address this vulnerability in their priority patch cycle. While currently not actively exploited, the local attack surface remains a concern.
Exploitation Status
Signal | Status |
|---|---|
Known Exploit | No |
Public PoC | No |
Actively Exploited | No |
Ransomware Use | No |
Affected Versions
All versions prior to vendor patch.
Mitigation & Remediation
Organizations should patch Bome Restorator to the latest version to remediate this vulnerability. If a patch is unavailable, consider implementing input validation measures to limit the length of input in the Name field.
For comprehensive security assessment, organizations can utilize penetration testing services to identify similar weaknesses.
Detection Guidance
Monitoring application logs for unexpected crash reports can help detect attempts to exploit this vulnerability. Additionally, anomalous input patterns in the Name field should be flagged for review.
AppSecure Threat Intelligence Insight
The significance of this vulnerability emphasizes the importance of input validation in application development. Security teams should learn from this incident and implement strict validation rules to prevent similar vulnerabilities.
Moreover, organizations are encouraged to enhance their security posture by adopting a proactive approach to vulnerability management, including regular assessments and timely patching.
For further reading on vulnerability management best practices, consider reviewing our article on vulnerability management program design.
Lastly, embedding security practices into the software development lifecycle is crucial. Teams should ensure rigorous testing and validation processes to safeguard against similar vulnerabilities in the future.
Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.
.webp)