Cloud Penetration Testing: What It is and Why Enterprises Need It

Traditional pentesting tools weren’t built with the cloud environment in mind, and that’s where many security programs fall short. As your company shifts to cloud-native or hybrid environments, you face a whole new set of risks. Worse, misconfigured S3 buckets, overly broad IAM permissions, and insecure APIs don’t show up in legacy setups.

This is where cloud penetration testing comes in. It targets vulnerabilities unique to cloud infrastructure and services. Moreover, it goes beyond surface-level checks to test how real attackers could exploit cloud-specific flaws.

tl;dr: Cloud penetration testing identifies how attackers exploit weaknesses in your cloud setup, across services, identities, and configurations. They cover everything from misconfigured IAM roles to exposed APIs and privilege escalation paths. AppSecure’s manual-first approach simulates cloud attacks across AWS, Azure, and GCP, helping you uncover blind spots, meet compliance goals, and strengthen your overall cloud security.

Why do cloud environments require specialized pentesting?

Moving to the cloud isn’t just a lift-and-shift, it changes how your infrastructure works, how it scales, and how it’s attacked. That’s why security testing in the cloud needs its own playbook. The risks aren’t just different; they’re often invisible to traditional pentests.

Here’s what makes cloud security unique, and why specialized pentesting matters:

• The shared responsibility model isn't just fine print

Cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and GCP take care of the infrastructure. But everything you configure, store, or run in the cloud? That’s your responsibility. A good cloud pentest focuses on that layer, where mistakes actually happen.

• Infrastructure isn’t static anymore

With containers, autoscaling, and serverless setups, your infrastructure is constantly changing. Traditional tests can miss things that only exist briefly or behave differently under load. Cloud pentesting accounts for that fluid, real-time environment.

• IAM gets complex, fast

Cloud access isn’t just about logins. It includes roles, policies, trust relationships, and inherited permissions. Since it’s easy to over-provision access, testing your IAM setups for privilege escalation and lateral movement is critical.

• Cloud services can be public without you realizing it

Misconfigured storage buckets, exposed APIs, and open databases are some of the most common (and dangerous) risks in cloud setups. They often don’t show up in generic tests, but specialized tools can catch them.

• Generic tests miss the cloud-specific gaps

Most traditional pentests aren’t built to understand cloud-native tools and workflows. Without context for how services are connected or where sensitive data flows, they miss the big picture, and the big risks.

Key risks and vulnerabilities in cloud environments 

Cloud environments come with flexibility, but it can introduce gaps attackers love to exploit. Let’s look at some of the most common risks cloud pentests aim to uncover:

• Misconfigured IAM roles and policies

Identity and Access Management (IAM) is one of the most powerful, and dangerous, components in the cloud.

Misconfigurations like using wildcards (*) in Action or Resource fields, assigning policies directly to users instead of roles or groups, or enabling unused access keys can expose sensitive APIs or services.

Attackers often exploit these to escalate privileges or gain persistence using assumed roles or session tokens.

• Publicly exposed storage and services

Cloud storage like AWS S3, Azure Blob, or GCP Buckets are often left open to the public due to misconfigured ACLs or bucket policies. In some cases, teams forget to disable directory listing or fail to implement HTTPS.

Services like Elasticsearch clusters or Kubernetes dashboards are also sometimes exposed without authentication, giving attackers direct access to infrastructure or data.

• Insecure APIs

APIs act as the front door to many cloud-native applications. Poorly secured APIs may expose overly permissive endpoints, lack authentication (or rely on outdated tokens), or miss input sanitization.

In real attacks, adversaries exploit these flaws to exfiltrate data, bypass authorization checks, or inject malicious payloads, especially in microservice-heavy architectures.

• Privilege escalation risks

In complex cloud setups, multiple layers of permissions exist across IAM, service roles, and Kubernetes RBAC.

Attackers often chain misconfigured trust policies, unused but active permissions, or mismanaged service accounts to escalate from a basic identity to an administrative one. Tools like PacBot or Pacu simulate these movements to test for hidden escalation paths.

• Lack of segmentation within cloud environments

Many organizations fail to isolate critical workloads. Flat network structures or broad security group rules make lateral movement easy. Inadequate use of VPCs, subnets, or firewall rules often lets attackers move from compromised test instances to production workloads with little friction.

• Excessive permissions on cloud-native services

Services like AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, or Azure Functions often run with permissions far beyond their operational needs.

Assigning AdministratorAccess or unscoped roles to serverless functions or container workloads significantly increases the blast radius if those resources are compromised. Least privilege isn’t just a best practice; it’s a hard requirement in modern cloud setups.

Core phases of a cloud penetration test 

Cloud penetration testing follows a structured methodology that mirrors real-world adversary behavior in cloud-native environments. Each phase uncovers specific classes of vulnerabilities and maps out potential exploitation paths within the cloud infrastructure. 

Here's how a typical engagement unfolds:

• Discovery and scoping

The testing process begins with identifying the target cloud environment, including cloud service providers, account structures, regions, services, and associated assets.

Scope boundaries are defined based on business priorities, compliance requirements, and operational risk tolerance. Testing parameters, access levels, and environment sensitivity (production vs. non-production) are clearly outlined.

• Threat modeling and reconnaissance

In this phase, threat actors’ likely objectives and attack vectors are modeled. Asset mapping is performed using passive and active techniques to identify external exposures, weak identity structures, shadow resources, and ungoverned services. 

Recon includes analysis of identity federation links, exposed APIs, subdomain enumeration, and public asset discovery across registries and buckets.

• Configuration review

A comprehensive audit of cloud configurations is conducted, covering identity and access management (IAM) roles and policies, storage permissions (e.g., S3 bucket policies), network security groups, firewall rules, serverless function roles, and encryption settings.

Misconfigurations, such as overly permissive roles, lack of MFA enforcement, or unencrypted data-at-rest,  are flagged based on security benchmarks and provider best practices.

• Exploitation attempts

Identified misconfigurations and weaknesses are validated through non-disruptive exploitation techniques. Examples include privilege assumption via misconfigured trust policies, SSRF attacks targeting metadata services, over-permissive function invocations, or access token abuse.

Each exploit attempt is scoped, controlled, and designed to demonstrate real-world impact without affecting service availability.

• Privilege escalation and lateral movement

Post-exploitation testing evaluates how far an attacker could move within the environment. This includes IAM privilege escalation, container breakout attempts, access to cross-account resources, and pivoting between workloads.

The focus is on identifying escalation chains that could result in complete environment compromise or access to sensitive data.

• Reporting and remediation guidance

The final phase produces a technical report detailing all identified risks, their potential impact, and recommended remediation steps. Findings are prioritized based on exploitability and business risk.

Reports typically include evidence, reproduction steps, and guidance aligned with the organization’s cloud provider and architecture. Stakeholder debriefs may also be conducted to align on remediation timelines.

Cloud platforms covered during testing

Each major cloud provider introduces distinct identity frameworks, service architectures, and privilege models. Effective cloud penetration testing accounts for these differences to uncover risks that generic approaches might overlook.

The assessment methodology is adapted as follows:

• Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Testing focuses on the granular IAM policy model, cross-account trust configurations, public S3 buckets, Lambda execution roles, and EC2 metadata exposure. The decentralized nature of IAM in AWS often leads to privilege escalation through overly permissive role assumptions or flawed trust relationships.

• Microsoft Azure

Assessment covers Azure Active Directory integrations, RBAC assignments across management groups, resource groups, and services like App Services or Key Vault. Risks include token mismanagement, excessive contributor-level access, and insecure application registrations exposing internal APIs.

• Google Cloud Platform (GCP)

Focus areas include IAM bindings at project, folder, and organization levels, service account impersonation risks, and unsecured API endpoints. GCP’s reliance on flat role hierarchies and inherited permissions often enables horizontal movement if least privilege principles are not properly enforced.

AppSecure’s cloud penetration testing methodology

AppSecure doesn’t treat cloud pentesting as a one-size-fits-all checklist, it takes a layered, attack-driven approach that mirrors how real-world breaches unfold in the cloud. Here’s how that methodology plays out:

• Misconfiguration and privilege path discovery

The process begins by mapping out IAM configurations, trust relationships, and API policies across AWS, Azure, or GCP. Manual reviews surface overly permissive IAM roles, unchecked service trust, and chained policies that facilitate privilege escalation, vulnerabilities automated scanners often miss.

• Attack simulation and red team tactics

Rather than relying solely on tool output, we use red-team-style techniques to simulate multi-phase attacks. These may include lateral movement via compromised service accounts, API misuse, and container breakout attempts, offering a more complete picture of how attackers operate in real-world cloud environments.

• Continuous collaboration

Throughout the engagement, security teams stay in sync with client IT, DevOps, and cloud admins. When critical discoveries emerge, such as a vulnerable API, we flag them in real-time, allowing stakeholders to adjust configurations or response strategies dynamically.

• Exploitation-ready reporting

Final deliverables include detailed technical reports with reproducible proof-of-concept steps. Findings are prioritized based on blast radius and exploitability, and contextual remediation pathways are mapped directly to the client’s architecture, no generic checklists.

Compliance and regulatory implications of cloud pentesting

Cloud penetration testing doesn’t just tighten security, it also strengthens your compliance posture. Let’s look at how cloud pentesting supports major compliance frameworks:

• ISO 27001 

ISO 27001 requires organizations to maintain an active risk management lifecycle. Cloud pentesting supports this by validating the effectiveness of technical controls across compute, network, and identity resources.

For example, penetration testers may assess over-privileged IAM roles, insecure storage buckets, and unmonitored services, risks often linked to Annex A controls like A.12.6.1 (technical vulnerability management) and A.13.1.1 (network security controls).

• SOC 2 

SOC 2 compliance hinges on demonstrating that controls tied to security, availability, and confidentiality are working as expected.

Cloud pentesting helps validate whether access restrictions (e.g., IAM permissions or security groups) are enforced, whether sensitive data is protected in transit and at rest, and if systems are resilient against real-world exploitation, all critical for passing SOC 2 audits.

• PCI-DSS

In cloud-hosted payment environments, PCI-DSS requires tight control over data flow, access, and segmentation.

Cloud penetration tests are used to test firewall configurations, discover improperly exposed ports, and evaluate encryption enforcement on cloud-native databases. They also verify whether segmentation between cardholder and non-cardholder environments holds up under attack scenarios.

• HIPAA 

HIPAA mandates strong protections for electronic protected health information (ePHI), even when stored or processed by third-party cloud providers.

Pentests look at misconfigured storage services, overly permissive access policies, insecure APIs, and missing audit logs. This type of testing supports administrative, physical, and technical safeguards as outlined in the HIPAA Security Rule.

• GDPR

GDPR introduces strict rules around data minimization, consent, and security by design.

Cloud pentesting helps ensure organizations don’t expose personal data through weak endpoints or excessive access permissions. It also reinforces compliance with Article 32 (security of processing), showing that proper access controls and risk mitigation measures are in place for cloud-hosted systems.

Best practices for a successful cloud penetration test

To get real value from a cloud penetration test, preparation is key.  Here are some best practices to ensure your pentest delivers actionable results:

• Define a precise scope

Start by mapping out which cloud accounts, VPCs, regions, and environments (prod, dev, staging) are in-scope. Include IaaS, PaaS, and serverless components like EC2, S3, Lambda, RDS, and IAM policies.

Be specific about objectives, such as testing lateral movement paths or privilege escalation via misconfigured roles. This avoids ambiguity and ensures the assessment is both targeted and thorough.

• Securely grant test access

Use scoped IAM roles or temporary credentials via AWS STS, Azure AD, or GCP IAM. Grant least privilege with detailed logging enabled. Avoid exposing access keys; instead, enforce MFA or IP restrictions.

If needed, use jump boxes in isolated subnets to monitor tester behavior.

• Prepare logging and monitoring ahead

Enable and review logging services like AWS CloudTrail, AWS Config, GuardDuty, Azure Monitor, and GCP Operations Suite. Make sure logs are flowing correctly to SIEM or centralized dashboards.

These help track tester activity and provide audit trails for post-test analysis.

• Account for cloud-native limitations

Platforms impose API rate limits, burst control, and resource caps. Serverless functions may timeout or restrict payloads. Plan around constraints in log retention or real-time visibility (for instance, CloudTrail’s 15-minute delay).

These boundaries impact how thoroughly testers can probe services.

• Prioritize post-test remediation

Review all PoCs delivered by the pentesters and validate them internally. Focus first on privilege escalation paths, publicly exposed services, and insecure APIs. Patch misconfigured IAM roles and apply network segmentation where needed.

Use Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) tools like Terraform or CloudFormation to roll out secure changes consistently across environments.

Secure your cloud infrastructure the right way

Default settings and automated scans won’t cut it in the cloud. With complex architectures, dynamic resources, and constantly evolving services, real security demands a deeper look. 

Cloud penetration testing brings that clarity, uncovering vulnerabilities that don’t show up in routine checks and giving you a view of how attackers could move across your environment.

If your team is operating in AWS, Azure, or GCP and you’re looking for a testing strategy that actually reflects how your cloud runs, AppSecure can help. Our cloud pentest engagements are tailored, manual-first, and mapped to your specific deployment setup and risk exposure.

Contact AppSecure to explore a custom strategy that aligns with your compliance needs, threat model, and business goals.

FAQs

1. What is cloud penetration testing and how is it different from traditional pen testing?

Cloud penetration testing targets vulnerabilities unique to cloud infrastructure, like misconfigured IAM roles, exposed APIs, or insecure storage. Unlike traditional tests that focus on networks or apps, cloud pentests cover dynamic, cloud-native risks tied to services like AWS, Azure, or GCP.

2. Which cloud platforms are supported in AppSecure’s testing approach?

AppSecure supports all major platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP. The testing methodology is tailored to each platform’s architecture, services, and permission models to ensure full coverage of native risks.

3. Does cloud penetration testing help with compliance audits?

Yes. Cloud pentests strengthen your readiness for standards like SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR by validating cloud configurations and access controls, and supporting continuous monitoring requirements.

4. Can AppSecure test hybrid or multi-cloud environments?

Absolutely. AppSecure’s approach is built to handle hybrid and multi-cloud setups, ensuring coverage across accounts, regions, and service layers with real-world attack simulations.

5. How often should enterprises conduct cloud pentests?

At a minimum, enterprises should test annually or after any major cloud configuration change, migration, or new service rollout. Continuous or quarterly testing is recommended for high-risk or regulated environments.

‍